The claim that we are a democracy is another of the flat earther biases. We are not a democracy as Menzie's post on coincident indicators clearly proof.
Democracy implies a proportionality in government and lets the flat earther assume skew can always be managed.
How can Menzie get his state sampling correct?
He needs to parititio9n the states into nearly equyal N, likely three groups, maybe two. The smaller states have lower resolution, there is only som much sample space available, the big states have much more. Then once Menzies =has the relative sampling rate, he can find mean, variance and skew. He will find that they rarely match except once per cycles. This is because the House and Senate are advised by flat earthers. There may ot be a solution except periodic turbulence. How many flat earthers are going to admit they wasted an entire career?
How can Menzie get his state sampling correct?
He needs to parititio9n the states into nearly equyal N, likely three groups, maybe two. The smaller states have lower resolution, there is only som much sample space available, the big states have much more. Then once Menzies =has the relative sampling rate, he can find mean, variance and skew. He will find that they rarely match except once per cycles. This is because the House and Senate are advised by flat earthers. There may ot be a solution except periodic turbulence. How many flat earthers are going to admit they wasted an entire career?
No comments:
Post a Comment