Einstein used the Zeta function to find thermal equilibrium when there was one ground state. He went with 3/2. What would be different if the world were made of ellipsoids? He would be looking for to independent ground states, his curvature would be 5/2. This would be obvious to him because he would have had three eyeballs, necessary to find his way among two independent axis.
When the bubble hit the Higgs density, and light quantization does a phase shift, where is the minimum phase path? The coagulants of the vacuum are spheroidal, phase finds groups of three among sets of two, 3/2. In an ellipsoidal world there are three types of phase bubble, three sizes; and the necessity of an extra axis of symmetry.
When the spectrum is splashed against the Higgs density all that remains is the vacuum curvature function, so the process finds that 108 number where 2*2*3*3*3 make 108. The sample rate simply reverts to its necessary natural irrational value about that point, and that yields the prime numbers all over the proton. The phase adjustment is mainly a phase shift, and that is going to happen in units of 1/3, as the system is counting down at that point, so quants are doing 2/3 and down. All the quantum numbers are going to cover the Higgs variance, if not, another rebounder will take their goodie.
Heisenberg's magic number, 127, the 3/2 power at the Higgs point, is either the current limits of precision in this epoch, or a definite bridge too far under any circumstance. I do not know. Again, topology theory will tell me some day, is 1,2,3 the best sphere packer around?
Seems simple, I just can't formulate the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment