Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Why is packed matter stable under low temperature

If the point of packing the electron and the quarks was to maximize entropy and minimize phase variance, then low temperature does the job of minimizing variance.  Why don't the quarks and electrons degenerate? Seems like a wast to keep all those particles when energy is so low. Dunno. Maybe the range of stabilization is simply large.
 The theory is that matter knows about time, but it really doesn't. It knows about relative quantization variance, and decay is a sampling error, resulting in a requantization.

Say what?

A record cold temperature of 450 ±80 pK in a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) of sodium atoms was achieved in 2003 by researchers at MIT.[8] The associated black-body (peak emittance) wavelength of 6,400 kilometers is roughly the radius of Earth.
That seems confusing, it is 10e18 times the Compton radius of the electron, as measured by physicists with the meter unit. 
According to modern research, the electron is assumed to be a point particle with a point charge and no spatial extent.[1] However, the classical electron radius is calculated as [ the number above]

I do not know what they call spacial extent, the the electron is packed Null, with about 1/3 of it phase bubbles.  But using the electron as the reference, the ratio comes to 1.8e22, while the Higgs exponent is 107, coming to 2.3e22. I do not know what to make of this. If I cooled my spectral chart that much, I would show the Compton wavelength of a bubble, and the number would be 2.3e22 (1/2 +sqrt(5)/2)^107, or(3/2)^127; assuming Heisenberg and Higgs agree on the smallest quantization value of a light sample. It makes me wonder if they just defined the electron 'point' source to be the smallest wavelength. This would be no great insight on my part, it would simply mean physicists are being symmetric and flat.

What the Compton wavelength of a bubble tells us is that they can wait for 6,400 kilometers between samples of light before their size becomes out of variance.  That's a damn accurate bubble. It also tells us the distance that a Lagrange point in gravity will be stable before it needs help from a free proton.

Absolute zero

 The sample rate when all you need to measure is the vacuum. None of the other wave modes are present in the system, except enough to keep packed nulls packed. It explains why helium acts so weird, the gyro machine in the proton is at rest. My guess is that the proton is so stable, even at absolute zero, is because it grabbed a lion share of Nulls, unbeknownst to physicists.

No comments: