Cosmo Magazine:
Astronomers believe the universe originated in a superheated-flash around 13.7 billion years ago called the Big Bang, and started to expand. After the cosmos had cooled a little, electrons and protons teamed up to form hydrogen, which for hundreds of millions of years filled the universe. During this epoch, known as the universe’s ‘Dark Ages’, there were no stars. It was followed by a period known as re-ionisation, in which the first stars formed and their intense ultra-violet radiation managed to pierce the hydrogen fog.
This is very misleading. There is no infinite frequency by which the vacuum is disturbed. If there is existence then there is a finite, but relatively irrational frequency of supportable disturbance in the vacuum. End of story, proof of existence. If the astro physicist posits something, then he has posited a frequency of disturbance; the two are codefined. It is the definition of counting an existence.
Tells us, instead, what was the relative distribution of axii of symmetry when neutral hydrogen was created compared to when star formation occurred. That is what we need to know. So far, our theory of existence says that relative distribution was about the same, maybe a difference of one or two wave numbers, not much more. So, the relative precision of light was constant compared to the dominate Compton equivalent of matter, sorry, there is no other way.
There is one way out of the dilemma: The curvature of free space went from very straight (high temperature) to much less straight; and the precision of light dropped, and the total number of available axii of symmetry dropped, but the density of the axii of symmetry remained about the same compared to the precision of wave numbers.
When the ruler was nearly flat
This is a world where, counting wave numbers starting from the noise of the vacuum, many of the wave slots were packed with coagulated matter of long wavelength. The whole array of particles we predict but never see in a curved vacuum. This is a very highly organized universe, a virtual atom of universal scale, with an enormous natural free wave frequency. It was not a fog.
The most likely scenario
The universe is more organized than we think, there are the equivalent of atomic orbitals on a universe scale, but we have not yet deciphered the code. In terms of 'general relativity', we have a lot more adjustments to make. Take these largely red shifted galaxies and assume they are rotated left by 20 degrees, and their light has made a sweeping curve back toward us. Then swing your telescope 40 degrees in the other direction. Do you see a mirror image? Look more closely at the cosmic background radiation. Are there axis of symmetry you have missed? Be clever, it is there somewhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment