Things that bother me

The relative densities of galaxies today and the CMB  do not match, the Big Bangers claim. The Hubble deep space takes just a tiny part of the CMB picture on the left. I have a hard time seeing the density variation is so dis-similar.

And below, I wonder what it means the 20% of the red shifted galaxies seem gravity lensed. My theory says that when waves hit the Higgs they do a 20 degree phase shift, the mixing angle. The rays we see are the rays that combine from the under sampling of the lens, along a path perpendicular to us.  Is that the same ray that lines up with the emitting galaxy?

The Big Bangers would have us believe that the Plank curve of the CMB can be scaled back to visible light.  But my theory says that a round billiards table with a Planck curve of billiard balls can be scaled any where I want. Why wouldn't a box full of protons around a galaxy not organize into a maximum entropy Planck curve?

Is microwave subject to gravity lensing? Not as much, perhaps not at all, the band width is much lower. In fact, if all these galaxies held maximum entropy protons, the impedance match would be nearly perfect.

This is a color composite image of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Green circles mark the locations of candidate galaxies at a redshift of z~8, while higher-redshift candidates are circled in red. The estimated distances to these candidates have not been confirmed spectroscopically. About 20 to 30 percent of these high-z galaxy candidates are very close to foreground galaxies, which is consistent with the prediction that a significant fraction of galaxies at very high redshifts are gravitationally lensed by individual foreground galaxies.

while adiabatic density perturbations produce peaks whose locations are in the ratio 1:2:3:...^[68] Observations are consistent with the primordial density perturbations being entirely adiabatic, providing key support for inflation, and ruling out many models of structure formation involving.

This one is tough, how did they determine the density was entirely adiabatic?  How would I model galaxies today? Dunno, haven't thought that far. But my first guess is large galaxies widely separated and small galaxies more compact. But large galaxies would have more radiation.

Dave Dilworth says my theory cannot go anywhere until the Cosmic fore ground is replaced from the data.  They removed all known sources of microwave radiation from the data.