The spectrum of the cosmic radiation background

 T, temperature in this equation, is always fixed to the complexity of the set v, or frequencies.  It is set for their complexity when the radiation was generated, I presume.   See, I am getting suspicious, but I tire of backing out the morass of fake variables and getting back to sample space.

because red-shifted black-body radiation is just like black-body radiation at a lower temperature

Hmm...The black body spectrum will always have nearly the same shape, if the sample rate of light is always set to optimize the density of groups. That is the definition of temperature, the sample rate defined by a ruler of uniform curvature. I need to think on this.

The Number Line radiation 

 That equation is the error precision curve, 1/error,  for the perfectly curved number line. The maximum energy and the number of quants set the precision of the exponential,e. The temperature, normalized, is the minimum irrational number needed to measure marks on the ruler to 1/2. The shape is always set to something like the proton, where the density of groups against the size of the finite number line is maximized. When the shape changes then you are no longer in thermal equilibrium. This is a maximum entropy encoder in which the encoding quants are primes.   The only real scalar measurement in physics is precision, how many separable quants and that is temperature. At equilbrium, every uniform curvature has a Higgs.

I have a hard time not noticing the spectrum of the background seems to correspond to optimum clumps of free protons helping stabilize gradients. The longest wavelength of these wavelength numbers being of the order 10e12 meters or there abouts. [Trying to use the same ratio of Higgs to visible light]. Sitting in clusters, perpendicular to the negative gradient toward from a quasar, stabilizing the thing? Especially if they are matched with neutrons and antiprotons doing the spiral and twist lines of symmetry. Since they are baryons, they are a power ratio of Higgs, and naturally would scale down perfectly.

while adiabatic density perturbations produce peaks whose locations are in the ratio 1:2:3:...^[68] Observations are consistent with the primordial density perturbations being entirely adiabatic,

1:2:3, Waddya know?

Mathematicians, where are you?


Now I got myself reading this, in which everything is written in units of fake time, gravity and distance? But it seems to me they are packing a sphere, once again, with two power series, one based on Higgs, and one based on a power of Higgs. Remove the relativity games with gravity and tell me why this is not happening today. I see no problem with the proton managing a vibration mode that covers the spectrum, acting like a synchronous spherical microwave cavity that support electron flow up from the accretion disk. But there would be two anomolies, one for flow along the hemisphere of the accretion disk, and one for baryon flow out from the quasar beam.

Ref: T HE A STROPHYSICAL J OURNAL , 471:30 È 51, 1996 November 1 1996. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. ( ACOUSTIC SIGNATURES IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND W AYNE H U Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Sciences, Princeton, NJ 08540; whu = sns.ias.edu AND M ARTIN W HITE Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; white = oddjob.uchicago.edu