Making the sphere packing Plank's curve

Completely out of scale, but the relative shape is close to the packed Higgs spectrum. I hesitate to go into the morass and normalize Boltzmann's constant to power spectra. Anyway, this is simply the Noise value for any given quant rate relative to the wavelength on the X axis, done in log2 format. The quant size grows with shorter wavelength, and so does the noise, up to the peak, where the lower quant size in the numerator dominates.  The peak occurs right where the quark/gluon machine is constructed.

I have SNR as area over volume, the reverse of what I thought. So, in statistical terms, the noise is the error in volume size. Thus, SNR drops as we make the total sphere larger.  It is packing volume efficiently, but counting surface area by quant number. Hence, my interpretation, signal is accurate to the quant number, volume is increasingly noisy. So this is all strictly Shannon using SNR as volume to area. I used the most irrational number as the base for SNR.

The point of physics and shoes is simple, you can only pack spheres up to the accuracy of light, or the accuracy of the checkout counter. Why is this curve diofferent from the bankers curve? Bankers measure Noise to Signal, I think, and physicists just measure noise. But they both use wavelength on the X axis.

This is also finite number line theory and Heisenberg theory. The error in b must match the error in 1/b, fractions and wholes split the error.