The two Boeing crashes. The bot was trained to over ride the pilot, under some narrow circumstance, and all the bot relied on was the angle indicator, an instrument measuring airflow.
Clearly a blunder to give limited information to the bot, it should have known the terrain, the point in takeoff sequence, air speed. The bot should have been operating with a 3-D map of everything going on, including dynamics before over ruling the biobot.
Boeing blundered, from the evidence so far, this is a blunder that will cost Boeing and make them rethink how to give the bot the same view of the pilot, at least, including maps and traffic and control tower signals. This was a blind bot.
This was my career once, flight control in difficult air battle scenarios. Now, today, I would actually be called an expert, if they wanted the proper architecture review, I am the guy. And Boeing blew it, sorry, I can tell that.
It is a big data problem, but all the data has the same axis of symmetry about the air port and elevation and horizontal direction and speed. So matching terrain maps and flight position, all that, easily coalesces into a simple pattern matching problem. The whole key is, like this one, what to do when sensors indicate emergency, this bot had no sense at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment