It is sometimes helpful not to look at any one specific issue in detail, but rather make a survey of ongoing processes instead. The resulting picture is neither better nor worse, it is simply different. This is what I want to do today: to take a bird’s eye view of our suffering planet.

The tree trunk is not getting rounder, let us look and see if we full hemisphere on the branches.  another way to say it, what is the smoothest ellipsoid that fits along an equiprobable boundary of events.  Like an atomic orbital.

Then he describes the scene from the point of view of foreign policy.  But that scene repeats in financed, the trunk isn't getting rounder, and keep trying will drain liquidity beyond sustainable.

An MMT is like a flattening the orbital to the ground state momentarily, kind of scary. We doing one great big hunk of an observation, measuring generational imbalance. We are likely to do this over a fairly quick negotiation. Use this moment to buy that long term contract from Congress, mention the rebalance, they will agree.

In filter theory, we are placing a hole to counteract a pole.  In self sampled system, we are fixing that moment when millennials out vote boomers, there is a mis-sampling and zero crossing. It is built in to the right to coin, and we acknowledge that.

With the New Fed, we agree that major government programs will be sampled about  three times. as often, maybe a bit less.  Cash flow accounting really means cash flow account more often than you cash flow accounted before.

The other key is the renewal clause, we want government agencies to financially vote on doing another 15 years, hedge the renewal. The option offers  maybe  half the default, yet again. We are tying to meet difficult spectral constraints, the hedge is out imaginary axis. If you are hedging in finance with DSGE, you are implicitly using the math guys version of imaginary. We have a very finite version of that.