It is in the first and second; the right to secure defense, the right to assemble. It is in the 13th, the prohibition against slavery.
The only mention of birth in the constitution is when one becomes a citizen. The fetus is, at best, a seriously disabled, unthinking agent of harm to the woman's body, her right to immediate self defense remains, in the constitution. This is no different than a cop defending himself from the insane, sorry about the law. The new rich white guy is so full of shit about this, he is likely to be another Sotomayortype. Whatever we have had in the courts recently has been pure trash. I get this constitutional stuff better than the Supremes.
It is the law, you don't like it, go to church and pray. If you bother these pregnant women then it is aiding and abetting an assault, you will be arrested.
What is the technology issue?
From the legal point of view, and mostly true, when the baby is viable, the damage has been done, too late. She can sue the kid later, hell, I might file suit, lay claim to a big chunk of his dad's estate. If we get a technology that does the hard work, then fine, she can regurgitate the fetus at the appropriate time and have it placed in the aquarium.
Where is the barrier today?
Well gals, it is getting close to four months, the aquariums getting better. Your right of secure defense diminishes when the regulated militia can float the thing in aquarium. It is a moving boundary, and my best advice to women, learn your bzonker male pathologies before sex, before even hanging with those nuts. Be supervised until you have learned all the warning signs.
No comments:
Post a Comment