If we ignore quantization effects

• The Only 2 States That Can't Afford a Recession: Illinois and New Jersey (Liz Farmer / Governing)

The problem is a transition. The distribution of states, according to solvency, must transition left in a recession. The states with liquidity will tighten ship and contract, narrowing the distribution. The X and DX effects have to match in Euler fashion for this to happen smoothly, that means they likely assume Gaussian distributions, or bell shaped if this is an empirical convolution problem.

But, a recession of that sort hits a sluggish California, and the struggle to get a DX to X match in California is very costly. Our abstract algebra tree is skewed by state mismatches in the constitution, another set of related hard bounds. The solution to these bounds is motion, a revolving center of political power across regions.

But that motion has hit an aliasing point, California too compact relative to Mexico and Texas, it won't rotate, California is federally unelectable. W will revise out prime counting function soon.