Black Holes

  Neutron stars are not a problem, they are baryon matter.  Black Holes, with curvature beyond the Plank limit should not exist. The only thing inside a Black Hole should be a 'Higgs' standing wave, in which I use the wave number 107, beyond the proton wave number of 91. There would be Nulls at the corresponding mass ratio, but not enough to form matter, and the Higgs standing wave is still finite in curvature.

Quasars would be where we find proton production, at the edge of the event horizon, and this would be where Higgs does its job. The center source of the beam from a quasar should be about 1364 times the Compton frequency of a proton, and the spectrum of light should be all the peaks in my spectral chart, up to the proton, and the only matter exiting would be baryonic. Quasars should be producing neutrons and protons, mainly nulls pulled into the system by light. This:

In this formula, ΔV is the rms velocity of gas moving near the black hole in the broad emission-line region, measured from the Doppler broadening of the gaseous emission lines; 

Should end up as my spectral chart, on the page to the right of this blog.

The matter accreting onto the black hole is unlikely to fall directly in, but will have some angular momentum around the black hole that will cause the matter to collect into an accretion disc.

Correct, no matter is in the black hole, only a standing Higgs wave.

However, this assumes the quasar is radiating energy in all directions, but the active galactic nucleus is believed to be radiating preferentially in the direction of its jet. 

Correct again, and the only matter in that jet is baryonic.  This is an ongoing process, not something from the big bang. If the Milky Way was emitting this beam, it would be a finely separated spectrum, and little or no beam spread until they were way above the event horizon. We, being at right angles, would not even see it.  Consider that we are viewing the universe with a microscope, but do not know it, we interpret everything as being bigger, redder and more spread out than it really is.

Quasars were much more common in the early universe. This discovery by Maarten Schmidt in 1967 was early strong evidence against the Steady State cosmology of Fred Hoyle, and in favor of the Big Bang cosmology.

Partly correct.  The universe has gone through untold cycles, each time the proton becoming more accurate, and each time the number of Quasars needed reduced.

The release of gravitational energy^[13] by matter falling towards a massive black hole is the only process known that can produce such high power continuously.

A proton gradient at the edge of the gravitational field fines tunes the gravitational gradient.  These proton gradients form all the way out to flat regions of space where the protons dissipate to form cosmic radiation. Ask yourself, do we get more bubbles, the same bubbles recycled, or the same bubbles organized with more complexity? I dunno.