for a given magnetic field strength B
Not if m absorbs and releases phase imbalance. Put a proton in the thing, and assume the proton has a large, stable mass of nulls. What happens? Much of the exposed proton charge settles into the proton, happily content to take a free ride.
Once again, the free space impedance is not the issue, the proton mass has its own impedance, an ability to absorb a phase imbalance and hold it. The physicist thinks the mass is separate, so he is in effect measuring a quant under the assumption that the SNR of his signal is constant. The proton just drops SNR down by absorbing phase, the physicist measures smaller values.
Correct using relativity, and the conclusion is the mass has gotten heavier than it should, but in fact the field action B*z around the cyclotron has gotten weaker than it should.
Measuring the mass of the proton, rather than theoretically calculating is a difficult problem that I am thinking on. Anything that stable will have a huge margin of adapting to altered phase environments. If you smash a proton, much of its mass moves away, pushed along by the gluon wave motion. This is a difficult issue.
My best guess, right now, would be to construct the equations of the muon atom and the hydrogen, together, using an assumption of charge/mass ratio between the two. The deviation in size measured is an indication of the ability of the proton to absorb and release phase imbalance, and is likely the best indicator of phase/null for the proton.
The asymmetry of that quark matrix is .003, max. Square that and get .00009, the inverse is the capacity to hold imbalance, to change size, actually. I get 9.3e-5 at the peak of the wave/null spectrum, the same number. This is correct, the proton is balanced wave and null, so it has a large capacity to change mass/phase ratio. The proton can actually track the curvature of space.
No comments:
Post a Comment