Let's do a quant tally, with suggestions and uncertainty

Of the proton limit of 108 null ratios:

36 or 19? Proton
15 or 18 ? for the atomic orbitals
18 or 15 ? for the range of magnetic dipole
20 for gravity out to the galaxy level

89 Total, with wave number 75

That leaves 19 for vacuum noise and protons in free space.

On the electron/magnetic. The mass of the proton puts the electron at 18, but I do not think we count embedded phase, so I have it at 15. Otherwise the two should be swapped. I still have the magnetic below the electron so it can couple with gravity.  But there is no reason to think that the magnetic we have was the same as the magnetic we might have had.

Physics may still have some confusion on that. Here is the catch. There is no reason to think the magnetic from the Sun and planets is the same order as the atomic magnetic.  If the electron generating motion is computed using just the presumed space impedance, then the numbers need to be rechecked. The way to check things is to have out computer go thru the chain and compute the Shannon matches for each run of the quants, and from that compute SND over the whole chain.  The one you want is the one where SNR is uniform over the chain.

I gave all the quarks and gluons 36, but that might just be 19, because that number puts us at 89, the spot to which Plank measures, and seems more likely. But that left three spots for quarks, and they would need a hellavalot of color to make that six. That would put the electron at 70, 19 down, the next sweet spot. The next spot down, then becomes 38, 32 spots, way too much for the magnetic, I think.

I am sort of approximating at 89 because that is a point where light and mass are awfully close. I also notice that Plank  divides between null and wave into orders 89,75, and I would expect Plank to measure out to the accuracy of gravity, or the proton, but not farther. The 19 comes about because that is another hot spot.  The Shannon error at 19 and 89 that is, 9.3E-4. The same error I get at null 127, (having wave 107), which I consider to be the location of the Higgs wave. If gravity counts down from 89, and that is the Plank limit, then residual error, in units of bubbles is remarkably low. I hesitate to give the number because it is so low that I don't believe it, but it is in the range of Mercury's orbital error, as a percent.

The protons are cycling thru the universe and keeping these quants accurate.  The protons reach the fringe, there is not enough SNR to maintain them and they dissipate, keeping the volume of space cycling down toward the center.

What happens when the gradient exceeds the balanced curvature at some point in space? Gravity couples with the magnetic to make a Shannon match. All the free nulls in the magnetic layer get quantized, the atomic layer is crushed, we compress and make a surplus of protons, restoring balance in curvature.

The sample rate of light comes out as that ratio simply because primes block the Shannon groupings, and the primes are 1,2,3,5,7,13; 7*13 = 91, the number of light quants.   And the prime 11 was reserved for God and a bunch of Phd students. But my guess is that free protons got the prime 13, and the 6remaining are vacuum noise. If you want to do this with GR, you are going to need some 13 of those +--+++-- marks you put on your tensors.

Protons climb curves too steep and roll down curves too shallow, keeping their own density matched to necessary space curvature.

Seriously, go to a sampled data system, use the theory of counting up.