The proton has only one percent Nulls? Not any more.

When physicists measure mass of the high order particles, they measure momentum, M*V, so one has to work backwards to get the phase vs null. They say the proton is only one percent matter (null)!. That cannot be, it has the same phase imbalance as the electron, making the electron have negative mass!

 The mixing angle determines the phase/null ratio with the proton and the electron. Their numbers are right except they are mixing phase and null, and using the same space impedance yet again, which becomes a common term. That why they do so much work, I think. Their Compton pairs are shifted, but otherwise they are fine. I can correct that.

Charge ratios are following the 3/2 line, all the way down. It is what sets the EM impedance. Their mixing angle:

The 2004 best estimate of sin²θ_W, at Q = 91.2 GeV/c, in the MS scheme is 0.23120 ± 0.00015. 

Comes to 30 deg, or 180/6. That is the number I got by using the expected null ratio between the adjancent magnetic-electron null pairs. The atom just bumped the magnetic null by 3/2 and filled one half of that null ratio with one half of the positive phase, thus exposing a one sixth negative charge.

I never bothered to fix this because physicists got all their dimensionality right, and I assumed they knew what Compton pairing was all about. So work backwards, and the proton phase ratio is likely 1/1836th of that. It is no wonder the Heisenberg was so uncertain.

Otherwise, what is going on up at these levels is that phase has run out of vacuum density to maintain light speed, so there is no chance of phase running off with higher levels of null, and all the multiples show up (2,2,3,3,3) etc.

Those multiples are a result of a few cycles of the universe. Those multiples stabilized, and humans created a number system out of them. It was a gift from the vacuum to us, we did not invent the number system. The group theorists should be shamed for not noticing this, and correcting the physicists. The group theorists got the limit on light speed simply from Euclidean considerations, they should have gotten the theory of counting long ago.

So, go finish the job, what say? You can have the Swedish Banana.