The spacial size of a Lagrange point in gravity and the primordeal Neutron

Wiki has a full description of the lagrange points around the solary system, interesting. Lagrange points around the solar system

Orbits tend to be unstable a bit around these points. Borrowing from Einstein, we get the same equations whether we think the Lagrange points move around or whether the potential is too close to zero. We can make the same analogy if we believe in quantum gravity; either the quants can change ratios easily or they move around quite a bit. But the important thing is these Lagrange points have size of the order of 1E6 meters.

So take that as the Compton wavelength and then move the idea to a Neutron start where gravity half wave are only 10e6, so their Lagrange points only have 10E3 size, and that makes the Compton 'mass' of these fields very large in galactic standards, the mass of a neutrino, which we think is small, but compared to gravity nulls they are quite hefty. The proton is not supported, it cannot hold charge gradient in these intense fields. So what happens at the center of these Neutron stars? Maybe they have negative protons, negatrons.

I jest. But in a Black Hole, matter at the center is not even supported. The gravity nulls are huge, nearing a size greater than even the electron. They would have absorbed most of the Nulls in the center, the center would be devoid of packed Nulls, and most of free space would be a phase gradient, gravity having collected all the available nulls. If you continually grow gravity, what would you get? Gravity Nulls approach the size of a Neutron, you get the primordeal Neutron.

But the conservation of energy tells us that is impossible, we just cannot recyle mass and energy continually. Unless the Null quant ratio grew a bit. Such a thing would be possible because the vacuum needs to generate noise to keep its sample rates constant. But in a region where nulls and phase have become so widely separated, they would not get the opportunity. You get these bizzare regions of space where the fine grained accuracy of the proton is not supported, just these dull neutron like gravity nulls held in groups with a distance of a few hundred meters.  The Compton equivalence is off, Plank is way off. Nothing interesting, just dull void.

If I were a group theorist, I would change the mass/wave quant ratios, and see if there are spots just above the Proton where we can get a near integer 'one.  Somewhere near 107, up from 91, in wave number. I think the Higgs wave number is about 107. Reset the mass quant ratio to match that, see how much grouping is supported. I set the mass ratio at 5/3 and get a very lose match with wave number 138, keeping the sample rate of light at Fibonacci.

The 5/3 world

The idea is a dull world with two type of packed nulls, huge useless neutron like things, and gravitrons slightly bigger than an electron.  Very little kinetic energy, all precarious potential energy. This is the pre-big bang world. If this is what a quasar is, then they would be easily disturbed by the normal vacuum and occasionally shoot out huge quantities of 3/2 matter at high kinetic energy.  I am not sure quasars are sucking in matter but maybe shooting it out.