Say what is that 3/2 rule about Mercury?

The correction by 42.98" is 3/2 multiple of classical prediction with PPN parameters .^[6]
Thus the effect can be fully explained by general relativity. More recent calculations based on more precise measurements have not materially changed the situation.

Well, that is something I need to look into. Einstein and general theory of relativity has correction parameters to use when deviating from Newtonian gravity, and waddya know, the magic number, 3/2, shows up! It showed up in the relativity correction to the orbit of Mercury. I am sure my theory covers this, something I will be getting into.

Got it. The impedance, the ratio of wave number for the proton and the wave number for gravity is not uniform across the diameter of the planet.  So, likely the null quant number for the gravity shifted with no ill effects except your integrals have to be use a different dx,dy,dz different by the ratio 3/2. We have a Shannon separation violation.

This happened because the phase gradient near the sun was curved and steep relative to the planet volume. Angular momentum was not conserved using the usual integrals.

Anyway, this was a big deal when it was first corrected by the Einstein field equations, which basically define when the integral theorems work and when they don't. THis is what I mean when I say that all I am doing is numerical tests to see if the dx,dy,dz still converge in unison, a trick used for numerical integration and for Taylor series expansions and such.  

Better solution:

The easier way to do this is simply scale up to the precision of the proton, then use the twos binary quants. Recast the problem as a sampled data problem, dump time all together. Create the complete sequence, then phase minimize. If that doesn't work then you are likely already dead from a nuclear explosion.

Why would the quant ratio change a bi for gravity near the Sun?

Coupling between the magnetic and gravity, or the presences of protons in free space.  The positive phase of gravity is a phase disk, perpendicular to the the L1 spot, the gravity null.    You will likely find is warped a bit when you orbit close to the Sun. But if you are computing numerically, correctly modelled the phase equations, and have scaled up, that factor should be taken care of.