What is the relationship between the proton mass and the electron mass? The electron mass is the limit of inertia of the neutron, no?
Even if I was, log(x) = log(y) when x = y, since I would use the common logarithm. But, how did the physicists ever do log base 3/2 on the mass of the electron?
If the electron was a measure of the change in exponent then we have the answer. F = (3/2)^n dF = N(3/2)^(N-1) dF/F = N*(2/3)
So if we are standardizing mass as a change in F relative to some phase offset then the standard is N*3/2, where N is the exponent of the proton.
Compton says I am measuring mass if my ratios are right.
As an aside, I make the assumption the world is encoded, so everything we pick in the world will be enumerated by a 108 digit number in base (3/2), for example. So, in my world, there are (3/2)^109 -1 enumerated items to pick. When put in twos binary, all my -log(i) are all within one, or they are all equivalent fractions, and fractions are all within one half.
But these numbers are in that format. Except that the proton would be 2^N-1 if things were in that format.
But, time and distance for my model are the same, they are the constant number of nulls in the proton. Time is the sequence of exchanging each null, distance is the sequence of changing each null, at the sample rate of light. The proton moves N nulls in a time N nulls.
What is the proton's intertia? Is that a resistance to a force? Lets call a force a phase gradient that it must tolerate. Well, it has about 1e19 Nulls in the thing, when more than about 20,000 are late for phase exchange, it will move one Null distance in curved phase gradient of earth. The 20,000 is the inverse of precision, or 9.388e-5.
How is that in mass? Well, time, distance and mass are all the same, the number of nulls that will exchange in one complete sequence of a Proton, at the exchange rate of light.
No comments:
Post a Comment