Why is the 1836 proton/electron mass so accurate? I think I have it.

I think I am confused, my exponents are null  and frequency units, my powers are groups of nulls and groups of frequencies.  In base two, my powers would be units of entropy. But this is weird:

  1836 = 3*3*3*2*2 *17  = 108*17

The mass of a proton to an electron, this has to be  quants, not exponents. So my magic number must be energy ratio. Or they are screwed. Something is not right. When I count quants, I use a digit system with base 1.5, their number is, really, base two. Log2(1836) = 10.84, a ten digit number. This is weird, must contemplate.

It has to be mee, measuring entropy, not mass.

They did this integral somewhere. Then 3/2 was in the dt somewhere, likely measuring momentum.

Is this it? Is it this simple? The q, what they call the standard charge is 1/6 of the proton Compton wavelength, (1/2 of the electron is packed with unbalanced phase) so it matches matches the Compton mass.

But then they have all those artificial units of time to get a mass relationship:

So I have to sort out one of those equations where time, the non existent unit, appears in several places.  Also they have the c thing in there. I need to replace everything with Units of Bubbles.

Here is the thing. I think what they call m is really nulls.   The qB is really a phase offset proportional to the Proton wavelength, remember, B was defined by the atom using proton measuring skils, as was charge.  They are all units of Proton wavelength, or 1/Compton wave quant. So all the nulls cancel on the top.  Frequency is just a ratio in relativistic terms, it is simply a constant number of null exchanges in the proton. The phase offset is simply going to match the constant number of exchanges. 

So they integrate this thing over the frequency cycle they get log(Nulls), they get the exponent of (3/2)^108, multiplied by a constant. The group theory folks are not talking to the cyclotron folks.

This force must match the qB on the particle phase. They take a square root somewhere, getting time, making qB/(2*pi*m) The r/T remaining becomes the frequency. The radius should cancel because the magnetic/charge effect is distance dependent. But they need to keep one time unit because of circular motion.

If they just divide thru by f, the get mass*time per one cycle. But still, even if they integrated it would have been a constant.



The 17 in the exponent is likely from that Avogadro guy.

This guy. I still remember his big number.
6.02214129(27)×10<sup>23

I used to do PV=NRT, the gas law.
But looking thru all the derivations I did see him show up, though for a clue, his number is very close ro 2^79-1, makes me suspicious. But it does show up in the definition of mass.</sup>
 
  

Mathematicians, please intervene here, you are needed.