One out of ten

“This additional requirement … is in conflict with the Constitution’s specification of an inclusive open presidential primary ballot,” Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote in the 7–0 decision. “Ultimately, it is the voters who must decide whether the refusal of a ‘recognized candidate throughout the nation or throughout California for the office of President of the United States’ to make such information available to the public will have consequences at the ballot box.”

California supreme court striking down the tax return requirement for Trump.
No prior conditions imposed, within reason.  OK, great. They get one thing done without union permission.

Now tackle the other one where the mayor of San Diego was deprived of the right of assembly and speech.  Or the LA teachers contract which specified policy for city councils in the future, not yet elected. Or the one that says union representative must review each municipal legislative budget. Or the one that says a duly elected municipal legislator can be removed for reason of race.