Spin and motion
Spin, we think of mass in a whirl. Likely its phase in a whirl inside a packed Null. Packed Nulls really don't move, instead phase is swapping with Nulls. Large bodies, planets even, go around the Sun because gravitational aligned phase is swapping out the Nulls in unison.
Spin is a condition in which phase thinks it has a minimum path through the nulls, only too discover that other phase has the same idea. They cross in the mass and whirl away from each other. We interpret that as mass spinning.
Physics constants
The constants I found, after many trial and error, and posted in the previous post were unusual. The two numbers stood out in their integer error, there was virtually no error compared to any other of the five hundred exponents. Suddenly, error dropped from 10e-3 to 10e-5, and no other integer error came close. Why is this? Ask the number theory folks, but I think the place to look is in the continued fractions of these powers.
Spread sheet progress
I have just now reached the point of unwieldy, and am cleaning things up. I have the plotting software set up, and I am working the initialization sequence. It will work.
Valence charges
If you look at the Fibonacci packing algorithm, here, you will see that a number in with a unique double one. I think that valence phase plays a similar role. This is where I am headed.
Quantizing kinetic energy
I am looking at the relationship between Null packing with Nulls in motion. I will build the kinetic energy theory as a condition of Nulls not quite packed. There should be a relationship between the ratio of phase to Null that sets up a series of 'imbalance' quantization. And this imbalance should have a 'beat' frequency with valence charge. Whatever the relationship, there is not that many combinations of things to look at, the standard model chart is fairly small.
Taking physicists seriously
Well, they id a lot of work, making small charts, and they did that with billions of dollars and colliders and integrals. This is what I use, the things counted, and we would not have any theory without their hard work.
No comments:
Post a Comment