Government savings

Let us posit that the Swamp will continue its existence.

We can judge its efficiency, bad or good, by how regular it makes transactions.  Right that is shitty, mostly continuing resolutions. Getting budgets on track is an easy 5% gain from that measure, just getting a more up to date measure of imbalances. That is just cash management.

But with senators trained in long term outlooks for government schemes, we will get a lot of middle and long term adjustment yielding better predictions in out years, another 5%, and they have a common multiplier.  can see yearly savings of #300 billion, and letting the senate keep a third of that under Due Process? Why not. Vermont has a state budget around $6 billion. They can earn $2 billion and use a small portion of that to get educated on sound government management, it pays well.

The small states have to collude a bit. who gets the,  New Fed trading center? The state that is willing to invest in new financial management, associate a university with the center. Can find electricity for the private servers, can provide cold temps. I like Vermont here. Center of sandbox, even.   If one state just devoted itself to ensuring person encryption we et a huge bonus, a bonded, trusted miner at the foundry layer. Ship your bare processors in, and they come out bonded by the state of Wyoming, like special gold coins. Put a hundren million in seed money. The world is their oyster.

The oddities of weather and geography remain in the map.  Wyoming knows the soft spot, medical management, maybe. But if they try for medicine in general, the map will signal.  We end up using the natural oddities as a convenient separator by specialization. So what?W e end up with odd experts, hospital managers who ride horses, it is the price they pay, it is subsidized.

Due Process insures the map, it, at equilibrium, allows the individual to bet their preference, based on residual conditions. Like equal access to the trade book in fair trade pits.