I like this House Senate cash swap the more I look

Think of Alaska, Wyoming and Vermont forming the:
Institute for Efficient Government management which guarantees them  large quantities of earnings in the swap. As senatros execute the good stuff, almost immediately.

Soon Anchorage has a 20,000 student campus on the subject, and they are no longer a small state. So there is a bound equilibrium in the long term, we are making the state system permanent.,  The current least objectionable of all the alternatives, and a big decision. I can see both sides, I am voting yes, let us hire the small state senators, but enforce Due Process on their earnings.

What else about the small three? They are cold, and sandbox likes cold, and sandbox is their main management tool. Solves hug government problems when couples with New Fed and sandbox.

Worst case outcome? We make government managers attend school in odd places, but in Vermont they have skiing locally in the winter, Wyoming, go fishing on horse back. Be a bush pilot government manager in Alaska.  None of those odd combinations have any systematic dire effect. The outcomes are nothing but good, potentially saving the union.

The swap gives meaning to Constitutional intent, both Due Process and Senate role. Ona can prove this to be a negative in the real long term, but we are not getting that far without it.