Kansas does not have the same returns to scale as California

Yes, rural Kansas is now, in some ways, reminiscent of seventeenth-century England.

Brad Delong, yet another delusionist, who fails the returns to scale test. Kansas has a problem, they cannot compete with California for federal health dollars because they are small, rural state competing with California.

They also have two senate votes, by the way. So Brad's dufas Keynesianism is for shit when the small states cannot see much beyond 2 years, while California plans a 15 year pension fund for 1 million health workers in large hospitals. Nor can Kansas afford to hire a bunch of incompetent economists and have them lie to poor Hispanic peasants.

So, you see, that is why we have this narrow corridor, idiot Keynesians claiming a proportional democracy when no such thing exists.  Include in that fact the Brad himself has discussed this smal stats issue and via some cognitive dissonance the issue vanishes when UC Berzerkely grads want  policy wonk jobs.

The small states will issue a shutdown, they are not likely to do another deal with the primary dealers until we begin to manage programs according to the Law. It is time to ignore the professors and their delusional assumptions. We are not changing the Law, we will conform to the law or suffer horrible multipliers, and there is no delusion that covers the problem, in California or the Swamp.

We cannot change the Law for the simple reason that we cannot take a bunch of progressives and their thousand page insurance contract to a Constitutional convention.