Sullivan is reviewing a book on the Antificants.
The rebellion is about taxation without representation, like most of our rebellions. It is about the Fed tax, sorry to say, a simple tax placed upon the kids and making banking too costly. So they rebel, as any good citizen should.
They are rebellion against Krugman, oddly, but they do not know it yet. On the other side of their battle are Krugman and Nancy trying to tax them and subsidize the public unions, a simple government theft like many others. The result always the same, rebellion.
If you notice the details, it is looking more clearly like antificant against the cops union, but also the professors union and soon the teachers union. Then they go after the defense budget union, then the ignorant small state governors union. The fight will continue until someone else is willing to pay the Fed tax. Andrew can pay that tax, or the folks at national Review can pay it, or tax Delong and Krugman and Nancy. Anyone but the antificants.
Nancy tried to sneak in a pension bailout, that was a huge indefensible blunder and causus rebelli. It is that kind of illegal shifting of burdens onto these kids that is causing the rebellion. Nancy is no longer able to get away with that carp. Most of the fraudulent economists put on notice.
Mish provides a chart to help out:
Millennial equals antificant.
Which state drove this result? California, naturally. So now Biden is picking a California affirmative actor? Somebody give Biden better advice/
No comments:
Post a Comment