Parsing lisp as packed char

Lisp processes left to right, no separators and always a parenthesis as the depth mark. If the variable nming was consistently defined, then all the parsing would be:


if(myword greater or lesser than the word on the tree). One would jump a series of test and jump, and get to a terminal node.  We allow continuing words per expression, naturally, we just pull the next word as a lesser significant integer.

A consistent naming convention is a convention that yields the same unique path to a terminal on reuse, methods defined by unsigned long pointer [], a generic integer.  So, we make it so, in the users manual, and we get an extremely fast functional byte code for lists. We are expanding our market for byte codes because they will be generated by the higher level syntaxes which can nest the codes properly on args list.

In the network complete example of this architecture, enterprise level syntax engines e using and reusing local data structures, symbol tables every where in tier operations, partioned in an infinite args list. So the high level python command to prepare the daily sales reports unfolds onto args list, at the local console loop in the sale department computers.  The locl loop may be running a shunt to order hem by volume, then ru it through the spread sheet extractor, then assemble, the enteprise level syntax returns from complete, the answer is in this current args list pointer.  Underneath, are tens of snippets, running sql_lite, spread sheet functions, stacking, listing.

All these snippets have high speed, plain text look up methods instead of call set up; everything universal interface. So the complete design of the enterprise system is in the hands of the enterprise data manager, reporting directly to executive staff. The data manager survives and stays competitive because he is supported by thousands of snippet authors, but reconfigurability allows the data manager to stay true to the unique enterprise level functions.

What is the point of failure? How does this collapse?

If the local console lops are well constructed, they will burp on error, take you back one step. The result is the boss gets a 'missing data, syntx error', in one of his rectangles.  The data manager is on the job, but the other five rectangles are just fine.