State couns. Markov

The three color system can count states.  3^n -1.   These are the possible states support by an N-1 bit counter.  The errors have two compnnents corresponding to charge and spin Erros are positive defnite.

N=1 I can count two states bu my errr term has eight staqtes.

My error term will always count eight states. The errors, the thing never counted o counted just one. are missing sample.

Spin and charge leave an error band.  There error is repsented by flow, the umber of new elements in that have not been counted and the number of elements that cam in the perius systle which giot conted once. Every new entrant follow one of six pah through the error generato. The new elemnt will always take the path of minimum variance.  But at any oven instance, the erros are independent gaussian arrivals.  This must be so because this is a channel packer.  One3 of the axis generates a new arival, the state of the queues change and the quque with the greatest relative imbalans will fire.

The one with the least pobable queu size fires, in first level then second l;evel.  But n incoming event should land in the queue with the least over load. So any stage in the system, the iput ququye is activted when least out of balance and output queue when most.
One monte carlo sample in and one out. The one in adding the most probable error state the one ot removing the least probable.

All of these states are countable, we can treat it like a graph and ount likely paths through. Every new error message adjusts two of the group queues.   Each new message count one new state, the error rolls over to the one bit. If the total number of integer states is large tthen the three queues grow large. And the three independent arrive rate grow large, there is a speed up of flow. The system is genertaing more zero crossings between the error bits and the one bit.

Equiulibrium is by clock rate. A system a low energy suddenly gets a rush of new error messages. The coutnt accumulate in the error network. until the count out and count in are equalized rates. The system starts removing errors in bigger chunks. Seperating out the arriveal rates isequivalent to selecting he bin sizes. Each of the six paths through become equally likely snd th bit boss has white noise in the error account.

Now the speed of light is always two steps. That remains constant.  So we have to make the adjustments in queues size to make like always constant, a sort of combination of Planck's cure and relativity. If the elements in those queues were the number of elements to compute a tTylor series, then einsein would see that we need to jump the Taylor series up  notch. Plank would say, no, just raise the temperature of emission. Spin charge and magnetism? Gravity is a natural outcome. The most active arrival rates are aligned. The least active disalined.   The local erros are more finely distributed.

At the lowest energy level the three  queue with the same arrival rate, a redundancy.  They will alternate between 0 and 1; neither being constant stability. The mismatch between the two should be Plansk's. I think that is a Higgs, it cannot count on any axis.  The next two energy levels introduce the nest two axis. If we start at the lowest energy level and count all the error message going up to some number of significant digits, say N, then we should be able to count Avagadro against Planck.

But in a five color system then light is much faster!  Yes it is, light and dimensionality are related.

How in the frig this this all happen? God is not strong enough to hold a fie color, we got stuck with three. Six paths through make six forces the physicist will see. Two forces, or a symmetric one force for each of the three arrival queues.

When we externally increase the error count rate?
The three queues go off axis and the error band is not whit, it has a bas, and the N trit counter cannt count all the stats, the total number o count drop. The granularity of the queues drop, position on the X axis biased, causes humans to perceive distance and motion. The adjustment process sends out larger error adjustments,  dealing with the tails on those poissons. In any other axis, say distance, the line of motions i along a channel of largest error adjustment, the three queues are 'tilted' to create the line of fastes adjustment. Along the translated axis of motion resolution is limited and one cannot separate position and velocity.

If we just called x y z as 'distance' then right way we see the resolution of the various axis will be different, we have a relativity problem. We call a unit of time as the interval between arrival and departures, but we always get slight disequilibrium, our unit of time wobbles. Time actually remains two steps, but interval arrival and departure may vary.

Energy level and mass should be equivalent and relate to the number of  tribits counting state.

Message boundaries are made of the actual vacuum unit squishing along three axis. We squeeze one whole unit of vacuume, subject to Avagadros, the number of states.    Motion would be compression and decompression of vacuum bis I would think. A collection of protons, for exampel, shoulod, over time, hedge each other. Align axis. This causes dispe3rsal about a center. Spin and chage casue mgnetism. Anothe N reblance.

Mgnetism and gravits are disequiliriumissues.  Magnetism cause a bis in the burroudin vacuun so the quark can work off equilibim with positive bias in the error. Magnetic event are imbaances reparis by charge disequilibrium.  magnetism mustpass through the error band but it is trigger sponteneously ave an envet pinges on the system.