As Avagadro goes to infinity, precision, the rank of the error graph, goes to infinity, slower. The granularity of the channel increases and Newton is happy, calculus works.
In quantum computing that error generator is the error correction htat holds the mess together.
On gravity
Consider a worl in which spin is better aligned than the local adjustments realize.
Gravity. Why would the error axis want to orthogonalize? That is gravity, formation of square axis. The update queues become multiples of each other, and the asymmetry has to be caused somethng. It must be abpout the imprecision of N, the error positive.
Universe depends on a tendency to over or undercount N. One causes expansion, the other contraction. If we
Both the black hole and the explosion or spew ideas propose an N correction, one way or the other. If w are in a local quasar group then we are getting imperceptible N updates. This would be a slight expansionary force. I think i depends on what we can figure out about the 5D barrier.
The 5D barrier are the five aliasing peaks we will get at synchronization.
I make a proposal on 5D. Two quasar group watching each other hit the 5D barier. Both will look across unknown axis and see greater explosion that exist, a glint effect. Looking from afar, it is a swirl and spew. Inside it is random explosions about. In reality these are simple N updates, fairly mild to us all. I think 5D is extremely unstable, it never appears but for moments in mild form, a kind of freeze adjustment we always miss. It is really a sparkle, like fairly dust everywhere.
Same with Black Holes. They are legitimate collapses in any 3D view, but in 5D hey are just N collapse sprinkled all over. If we tried to approach one, it is likely we would see ourselves wandering aimlessly, but we are just avoid the pothole and do not know it.
No comments:
Post a Comment