The smallest things that squish

I have a number of them, constant number. Thi is one thing. Let us derive some rules.

These are the same, they must form a continuum along their axis, else there would be a gap and I violate by rule, this is no longer one thing.

But if they form a continuum along their one axis, then they are struck, there is only one thing an I violate my assumption of a constant number.

Let us modify the action of the one thing, it can squish along one axis, but imprecisely. Now we have chaos, this is interesting. They are all equally mprecise, but must use that imprecision to hide the gaps. Along the axis their has to be motion adjustment of the squish variable in each of the smallest thing, I can talk flow.

My axis is a two color channel that need packing, we will be almost, but not quite, a two color system, our standard two color S/L.

We have boundary conditions.   If I get a perfect two color packing then I violate rule one again, there is now one thing.  If I get a single color packing, the other empty, then I violate imprecision. My extreme boundaries, one has a perfect bipartite match, the other  has no partition.

Do I have an optimum? Yes, they are all equally imprecise and so there is an intermediating market maker that is bounded white noise.  This is going to be fun, we can drive matter and anti anitmatter .AT either extreme my problem is that the market maker disappears. In the middle my market maker mus be the most liquid.  An exact match is anti-matter-matter collision. If the one color takes over, I get matter. which color takes over? Depends on the ratio when my market maker is maximally liquid, the optimum. But the market maker need flow, energy, that point is asymmetric.

A system of constant imprecision, let the number N be equally imprecise. The effect of an uncertain N is that the probability of anti matter collision and matter creation is positive. We are occassionaly unstable. How do the squishy thing decide their color? They select the most optmimum imprecise color that make local white. We will have these thing changing state locally, like neutrinos and the anti.  And their ration will always tend toward the optimum.

We can give it another axis of squish and get a three color, because our market makes grows in spectrum. In the two color we treated the third color as the market maker. What is a tripartite graph partition? Dunno, yet.

How does the pit boss work? It is one squishy thing in motion. It has no counterpart is neither matter not anti-matter. It manager the map between the two groups. It is by definition, unobservable operating withing the imprecision bounds.

Since there is flow, flow of the squishies in aggregate, One color must be producing to the other, there is always a subtle color shift. This is force.   To maintain white, there thus must be motion,. Motion accomplished by emitting matter of producing anti-matter collisions. A particle is a group that cannot partition back to the optimum ratio.   t any given point in the interior, te denstiy make if difficult to get any color separation that holds. The group in constantly almost one color.  The artitionmust be between boson and fermion because the dominant color is more congested.  So, at optimum, there must be a Pauli exclusion to limit fermions.


Adding more colors gets you more forces. if the number N does not match the universal imprecision,then their are moments when the market making process loops.   When the market aker loops i become permanent as the N now matches imprecision. This is the quark process. Quarks have bandwidth now to produce matter of both colors, positive charge. Particel are mon-color to the level of imprcision, so  color gradient will move the particle.

In any given region the number n, locally, must match the typical local variation in and tend toward white.  Quark system and the orbiting charge tend to white on their own, and the closer they are the less work for the market maketr, we get gravity.  The market make process consumes spectra, and specra is consumed. The system tend to minimize transactions.

What makes the proper N? The precision of the smallest thing.

We assume the system is finite dimensional, and the number three happens to arise as the most stable density possible, for some reason. If it is finite dimensional, then it supports compressed regions only a limit.  This system has no big bang.

In any neutral and balanced collect of thing, a particle can enter and induce a color disturbance.

The quarks have a special property, they have a surplus of bandwidth, their internal precision much better.   So the particles, in three, can vary their internal color separation within a wider band. Thus they neutralize any color gradient in the vicinity, have large mass.

Can I make N=1? No, you still need imprecision support, N mus always  be one or two at the minimum. The system should naturally expand until imprecision is is constant everywhere. N and precision have to match. What came first, imprecision or N? I think the concept  or start and end does not work.